Sermon: Praising a Mystery[1]
Text: Ephesians 4:4-6
8th Sunday in Ordinary Time (A)
May 25, 2008
Scripture introduction. Last week was Trinity Sunday, a time for us to pay particular attention to this central doctrine of the church. You may remember that we had so many other joyous and important things going on in the service that I decided to deal with the subject of the Trinity over the course of two weeks instead of one. So, I have departed from the texts of the lectionary for today. One of them, the one from Matthew, I like so much that I will save it for next week. After that, we will once again be following the lectionary readings, which take us through some of the more important and memorable passages of Genesis and Exodus and on up into Joshua as we complete this church year in November.
Last week I mentioned that the doctrine of the Trinity had its origins in scripture, and we illustrated this with the Great Commission of Matthew 28 and the Trinitarian benediction of 2 Corinthians. Our second passage this week, from Ephesians 4, is another text that supports the Trinitarian doctrine. The writer of Ephesians refers to the Lord, which, as we learned last week, was one way that early Christians referred to Jesus Christ. In this same passage, you will also hear references to the Spirit and to God the Father. These are mentioned, however, in the context of a strong emphasis on the word “one,” suggesting that all of these are joined in a mysterious unity. The passage is more poetic than analytic. Perhaps that’s the best language for expressing the overflowing love that is the Trinity.[2]
Sermon. Last week I addressed the reasons why Christians, from the early centuries until the present, have held to the doctrine of the Trinity. Thinking of God as three in one, and one in three, helped early Christians affirm that Jesus Christ was “God with us”—Emmanuel—without giving up their strongly held belief that there is only one God, as our reading from Ephesians says, “one body and one Spirit, . . . one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all, who is above all and through all and in all.” This history of the development of the doctrine is fascinating and is an interesting “window” through which to view early church history.[3]
But my purpose this morning is not to describe the doctrine in any more detail. As I promised last week after giving its broad outlines, this week I want to preach about some implications of this doctrine for our personal faith and for our lives together as members of Christ’s church. Of course, because we understand God as Trinity, there is no part of our belief or theology or practice of living that remains untouched by this central doctrine. However, I will highlight two areas of our faith and life that I think are particularly strengthened by Trinitarian understanding.
The first of these has to do with God’s attitude toward human suffering.[4] When we are suffering ourselves, do we understand that God is involved, and, if so, then how? All around us, our friends and fellow church members are battling diseases. They are good people, and we know intuitively that they are not suffering for any fault of their own. And consider natural disasters; what about Hurricane Katrina or the cyclone in
If God is in control—and we believe that God is in control—then it is hard not to hold God responsible in some way for the human suffering that we experience and that we witness in others. And this brings on the “why” question. It is only by faith that we continue to believe in God’s goodness when the hard times come. And having a Trinitarian understanding of God helps us keep our faith that God has not abandoned us, even in the worst of times.
Here’s what I mean. Karl Barth, a modern theologian whose writings about the Trinity have been very influential, cautioned us against any idea of God that is not centered in what we know of Jesus Christ.[5] As Christians, we do not find and understand God by the powers of our own intellect. Given God’s greatness and mystery, we could never do that. But we don’t have to find our way to God because God has chosen to come to us—in the person of Jesus Christ. If we take seriously the Trinitarian understanding that the other two persons of the Trinity are present when one is present, if we hold onto the affirmation that each person of the Trinity is of the same nature, substance, or essence as the other two, then what we see in Jesus is God. The way Jesus thinks is the way God thinks. Jesus’ concerns are God’s concerns. The actions of Jesus show us how God acts.
So if we want to understand God’s attitude toward human suffering, we should look to Jesus. From what is reported in scripture, we know that Jesus was deeply moved by the suffering he encountered. Often people asked him for healing—either for themselves or others. I can think of no case when he failed to respond. When the people were hungry, he provided food. When the tempest roared, he calmed the waves. In his sermons he made it clear that everyone was important. The people whom the world seemed to despise or ignore were the ones he drew closest to. He stood up for them, even against the political and religious authorities of his world. And finally, he gave his life for all of us in his own agony of bitter suffering on the Cross.
When we encounter suffering in our own lives, perhaps we ask the wrong question. Rather than “Why, God?”, maybe we should be asking “Where, God? Where are you in the midst of all this suffering?” Unfortunately, for centuries the theology of the church has suggested that God—particularly God the Father—cannot suffer and thus does not suffer along with us when we suffer.[6] While Greek philosophy was helpful as the
Finally, in the 20th century, theologians began to re-examine the
The second point is easier for me to articulate and for us all to understand. The Trinity is important in our daily lives of faith because it shows us how we are to live. We know from the Genesis passage we read last week that we were created in God’s image. We are not God, but there is something about our human essence that corresponds to God’s own nature. And what does the doctrine of the Trinity tells us about God’s nature?—that relationship is central to who God is. Relationship is so basic to God that there never was a time when God was not in relationship. In the essence of God’s own being, God is eternally three persons in communion with one another.
Now, here’s the point: if relationship and communion are so important in the internal life of God, and if we are made in God’s image, shouldn’t we also be in relationship with God and with one another? And the church is the place where this happens best. In the church, we can shed our pretensions of self-sufficiency and simply accept our mutual dependence and our dependence on God. Just think about it: every time you write a note of encouragement to another person, every time you drop an envelope in the offering plate, every time you welcome a visitor with a warm smile, every time you teach a child in vacation Bible school, every time you lift your heart in prayer for the needs of the world, you are reflecting the inner life of God. Dare we say it?—you are participating in the life of God.
God is love. True love expresses itself in relationship and in self-sacrifice for others. This is what we see in Jesus Christ. This is what we know to be true of God’s own self. This is our calling, too, if we are to become who God created us to be.
In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.
[1] This title comes from Chapter Two of Ruth C. Duck and Patricia Wilson-Kastner, Praising God: The Trinity in Christian Worship (Louisville, Ky.: Westminster John Knox, 1999) ISBN 0-664-25777-1.
[2] This phrase is taken from a recent theological statement prepared by a working group of the Office of Theology and Worship of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.): “The Trinity: God’s Love Overflowing,” http://www.pcusa.org/theologyandworship/issues/trinityfinal.pdf, received by the 217th General Assembly (2006) of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.).
[3] Philip W. Butin, currently the president of San Francisco Theological Seminary (Presbyterian), recently has written The Trinity, a good and short summary of the history and theology of this doctrine, all the way up to the present time. I am interested by his suggestion that in the western, Catholic, Latin-speaking half of the church (from which we Presbyterians are descended) the doctrine of the Trinity has been formulated as an answer to how God, who is one, can also be three. In contrast, in the eastern, Orthodox, Greek-speaking half of the church, the doctrine has answered how God, who is three, can also be one. The book summarizes more modern issues, too, such as how the doctrine of the Trinity has been understood by feminist theologians. Philip W. Butin, The Trinity (
[4] See Butin, supra, pp. 64-67.
[5] See Butin, supra, p. 59.
[6] See Butin, supra, p. 65.
[7] According to Neo-Platonist philosophy, the source of an ideal is always its purest statement. The farther we go from the source, the less pure is the manifestation of the idea. For example, the “idea” of a triangle was thought to be purer and more perfect than any triangle we might draw on paper. According to this reasoning, God, who is the source of all ideals, must be the purest and least changeable of all—certainly not susceptible of change caused by any less perfect (i.e., human) cause.
[8] Because Presbyterian theology is based on what came before, we should not be surprised to find this idea (called the “impassibility of God”) in our own Book of Confessions of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). See the Second Helvetic Confession, § 5.069 (“The divine nature of Christ is not passible . . . . Therefore we do not in anyway teach that the divine nature in Christ has suffered . . . .”)
[9] E.g., Jürgen Moltmann, The Crucified God: The Cross of Christ as the Foundation and Criticism of Christian Theology (