Sermon: “Living in the Light”
Text: 1 Thessalonians 5:1-11
33rd Sunday in Ordinary Time (A)
November 16, 2008
Scripture introduction. First Thessalonians, a letter of the apostle Paul, is the oldest book in the New Testament. He wrote it around the year 50, at a time when the early church expected the second coming of Christ to happen at any moment. Thessalonica, the location of the congregation to which Paul is writing, is in northern
In his letter Paul comforts the congregation, teaching them that at the second coming, the dead in Christ will rise first. Those who remain alive will join Christ in the clouds. Our text for this morning follows right after this passage about resurrection and concerns when the “day of the Lord” will occur. According to Paul we cannot predict at what times or seasons the Lord will return: we simply must be ready at all times. Paul’s message is alive with hope and positive outlook, a good example for us all.
Sermon. In his novel, The Promise of Rest,[1] Reynolds Price tells the story of Hutch Mayfield, a Duke University English professor, estranged from his wife Ann and also from his son Wade, who in 1984 had moved as a young architect to
I mention this book and this story because when we hear the HIV/AIDS statistics, it is so easy for our eyes to glaze over, as our “compassion fatigue” begins to kick in. I feel my own defense mechanisms mounting even as I read you the following figures:[2] worldwide about 35 million persons are infected with HIV, almost 1% of the population between the ages of 15 and 49. Almost two-thirds of those live in sub-Saharan
It doesn’t take long for statistics to make us numb. That is why stories are so important, even a made-up story like that of Wade Mayfield in Reynolds Price’s novel. Many of us have our own stories of friends or family who have contracted HIV. When I returned to
But AIDS is just one of many problems the world faces, isn’t it? Sometimes we devote a Sunday to these problems, too—things like world hunger, war, and racism. But we don’t have a Sunday for cancer, do we, or for pneumonia or heart disease. What is it that is different about HIV/AIDS? Why does the church take a special interest in this particular disease? I’m not sure, but I have a guess. I hope what I am about to say does not sound “preachy” or self-righteous because I count myself as a part of the phenomenon. I believe the church makes a point of remembering this disease because in the past, and maybe even now, we have been a part of the problem. In the
Indeed, the issue of whether or not to ordain as church officers gay and lesbian persons who are sexually active has been such a contentious issue in our denomination—and in other denominations—that we tire of talking about it. Despite our history on this particular issue, however, Presbyterians on both sides of the debate about gay ordination agree that gay persons should never be excluded from membership in the church. Even Christians who believe homosexuality is sinful also admit that, because we all are sinners, there is no justification for excluding homosexuals from membership in the church or for failing to welcome them. But what we know is right, and how we behave, are not always the same. Many of us remain uncomfortable around gay persons. Over the years the effect of our discomfort, which is communicated no matter how much we may attempt to hide it, is to push people away from the church—sometimes even those who have grown up as church members in our families. When the very fact of homosexuality is a taboo that cannot openly be discussed, it becomes much harder to educate persons about high-risk behaviors. Moreover, our own religious and moral scruples sometimes are responsible for driving gay persons into a dangerous subculture that makes it more likely they will be exposed to HIV and AIDS. The issues are much the same when we consider the two other groups of persons most at risk—intravenous drug users and prostitutes. I suspect there is a certain fear-factor, as well. We are afraid of becoming infected ourselves; and we would prefer that HIV infected persons stay away from us and our families, even though we know now how minimal is the risk of contracting the virus through casual contact.
In other cultures the taboos are different, but the effect is often the same. According to the United Nations 2008 Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, “Long-term success in responding to the epidemic will require sustained progress in reducing human rights violations associated with it, including gender inequality, stigma and discrimination. Although these social factors differ in their manifestations, intensity and impact between and within regions, they are present to some degree worldwide and in all cases impede an effective, evidence-informed and rights-based response to the epidemic.” This is the reason we take pains in the church to acknowledge the reality of the HIV/AIDS problem and even to consider repenting of the ways we, as the church have contributed to the problem.
When Paul addressed himself to the fears of the congregation in Thessalonica, he probably considered that Jesus would be coming back within his own lifetime. In the verses before our reading this morning, he includes himself among those whom he believed would be caught up in the clouds to meet the Lord. It turns out he was wrong on this point. But he was certainly right in his advice to the Thessalonians: “We are not people of darkness,” he said, “but people of the day.” Those who live in darkness will be surprised by, and unprepared for, the Lord’s return. But if we live in the light, we will be ready no matter when it might happen. Paul did not elaborate what he meant by living like people of the day. He simply said, “[E]ncourage one another and build up each other, as indeed you are doing.” I like that part—“as indeed you are doing.” Paul kbm==